From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 31 2:50: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F8737B630 for ; Wed, 31 May 2000 02:50:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id CAA28246; Wed, 31 May 2000 02:50:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 02:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200005310950.CAA28246@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" Subject: Re: ports/18917: Port update: palm/coldsync Reply-To: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/18917; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" To: arensb@ooblick.com Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/18917: Port update: palm/coldsync Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 18:43:18 +0900 At Wed, 31 May 2000 04:15:03 -0400 (EDT), Andrew Arensburger wrote: > >Synopsis: Port update: palm/coldsync 1.1.2 -> 1.2.0 > Apply the following patch to the palm/coldsync port: Thanks, but your patch looks unusual. Seems you took a diff between two shell archives, which is difficult to handle. Basically, what we expect is simply an output of a `diff -ruN' between the stock port and the new one. (i.e. a `recursive' diff between those two directories) Please regenerate the patch and send it over to us, thanks. -- / /__ __ / ) ) ) ) / Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ idaemons.org / FreeBSD.org "We're only at home when we're on the run, on the wing, on the fly" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message