From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct  5 19:58:39 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1AAF16A416
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu,  5 Oct 2006 19:58:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pho@holm.cc)
Received: from relay01.pair.com (relay01.pair.com [209.68.5.15])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B9B043D53
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu,  5 Oct 2006 19:58:38 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from pho@holm.cc)
Received: (qmail 58587 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2006 19:58:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO peter.osted.lan) (unknown)
	by unknown with SMTP; 5 Oct 2006 19:58:37 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 80.165.155.106
Received: from peter.osted.lan (localhost.osted.lan [127.0.0.1])
	by peter.osted.lan (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k95Jwadg019320;
	Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:58:36 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from pho@peter.osted.lan)
Received: (from pho@localhost)
	by peter.osted.lan (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k95JwZ3G019319;
	Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:58:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pho)
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:58:35 +0200
From: Peter Holm <peter@holm.cc>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Message-ID: <20061005195835.GA19157@peter.osted.lan>
References: <20061004203715.GA38692@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<200610050819.53832.davidxu@freebsd.org>
	<20061005002203.GB42061@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<eg2i81$ejp$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<20061005175606.GA77443@xor.obsecurity.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20061005175606.GA77443@xor.obsecurity.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
Subject: Re: Thread stuck in aioprn
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 19:58:39 -0000

On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 01:56:06PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:11:06AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > 
> > >I guess I was unclear: the stress2 test calls random syscalls with
> > >random arguments, so the error condition is probably from insufficient
> > >sanity checking of the input in aio_read().
> > 
> > Just a thought - does that include using random values of 0,1,2 for file 
> > descriptor?
> 
> I'd presume it could happen.
> 

Lots of syscalls will hang in this test, but the stress test
environment will send a SIGHUP and a SIGKILL when the default RUNTIME
has expired. That's the theory, anaway.

- Peter

> Kris

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
> 
> iD8DBQFFJUc2Wry0BWjoQKURApwkAJwNuaf3WTQRZ4Pr/uVQzzsUXo358wCg+kBN
> uRBatnsTQnE9KeS5ZXhqg7E=
> =uIN4
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----