Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 11:56:39 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: conrads@cox.net Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Deficiency in nautilus or metacity Message-ID: <1089129399.877.0.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20040706083128.conrads@cox.net> References: <XFMail.20040706083128.conrads@cox.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-0s0/4rhC4FKVxUd1joq3 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 09:31, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > I've been rather bothered by what I perceive to be a deficiency in > GNOME's handling of "launchers". Not sure if this is attributable to > metacity or nautilus or both (I'd be interested to know which). >=20 > When creating a new launcher, a rich set of options are available. But > bringing up the properties for an existing launcher, the user is > presented with a much more restricted functionality, preventing the > easy modification of certain properties. >=20 > I'm wondering what the rationale is for this, whether it's intentional > or not, and whether or not we may see some enhancement of the launcher > properties dialog in the future. Specifically, what properties are missing in edit mode that are there when creating a new launcher? Both of my screens are identical. Joe >=20 > Thanks. --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-0s0/4rhC4FKVxUd1joq3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBA6su3b2iPiv4Uz4cRAr14AKCQNhTMjJoPWSfZ/GXrhulWb+LmnQCgnO09 gZPKfbBMJrwzyciZG29M51Q= =AR/K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-0s0/4rhC4FKVxUd1joq3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1089129399.877.0.camel>