From owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org  Sun Feb 19 12:38:43 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2ACCE5F92
 for <freebsd-jail@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun, 19 Feb 2017 12:38:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E82DDFAE
 for <freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 12:38:42 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>)
 id 1cfQ9K-000FGH-Tl; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 12:59:30 +0100
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 12:59:30 +0100
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass@gmx.com>
Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: unionfs and nullfs combination
Message-ID: <20170219115930.GX13006@home.opsec.eu>
References: <72a56f7e-8e71-2b98-0978-6de863013ce5@gmx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <72a56f7e-8e71-2b98-0978-6de863013ce5@gmx.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" <freebsd-jail.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-jail>,
 <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail>,
 <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 12:38:43 -0000

Hi!

> One relatively cheap way to create thin jails in the pre-ZFS era,
> was to combine nullfs and unionfs (1). This seem to work only in
> 10 and previous branches. Do you use such a combination?

Ah, to correct myself here: We only used unionfs, not in combination
with nullfs. Can you describe why nullfs with unionfs does not
work in 11 ?

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         3 years to go !