Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:34:10 -0500 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Stefan Blachmann <sblachmann@gmail.com> Cc: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Reasons for keeping sc(4) and libvgl ? Message-ID: <CAPyFy2Dr0rEWxVYofskV-BULp%2BOKfW2SA-bvhmePpnUiayOw0w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CACc-My0%2B5zi9bsMpLWsOMmP8uiatTCBiJcvkOAS_3%2BXfrNWMvQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20211126160454.3eb827365a02103169ab9adc@bidouilliste.com> <CACc-My0%2B5zi9bsMpLWsOMmP8uiatTCBiJcvkOAS_3%2BXfrNWMvQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 at 10:45, Stefan Blachmann <sblachmann@gmail.com> wrote: > > - vt is so horridly buggy that it is no fun to use it at all if one is > accustomed to well-working, bugfree sc(4). Just one example: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211922 This issue is waiting on feedback since 2021-09-25. There is one issue that's still reproducible when I last tested, but "horridly buggy" is quite a stretch.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2Dr0rEWxVYofskV-BULp%2BOKfW2SA-bvhmePpnUiayOw0w>