From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jul 19 17:48:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mail-relay2.yahoo.com (mail-relay2.yahoo.com [206.251.17.77]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCEF15012 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 17:48:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jayanth@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from borogove.yahoo.com (borogove.yahoo.com [205.216.162.65]) by mail-relay2.yahoo.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA05306 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 17:48:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yahoo-inc.com (milk.yahoo.com [206.132.89.117]) by borogove.yahoo.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA16646 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 17:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3793C74B.4DE61DCD@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 17:48:11 -0700 From: Jayanth Vijayaraghavan X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: delay ack timer queue Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Should there be a separate delay ack queue atleast because a lot of tcp control blocks will be scanned that do not have delayed ack turned on ? It is not scalable too, if there a large number of connections. regards jayanth To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message