From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 23:33:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9DD16A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:33:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B42E113C448 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:33:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.26.75] (64-84-9-2-sf-gw.ncircle.com [64.84.9.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l0BNWkvm020394 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:32:47 -0800 Message-ID: <45A6C91B.1080709@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:32:43 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Angelo Turetta References: <45A68FFB.7020106@commit.it> In-Reply-To: <45A68FFB.7020106@commit.it> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig81B1470838B97750C9560E1B" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_6 version string X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:33:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig81B1470838B97750C9560E1B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Angelo Turetta wrote: > Am I dreaming, or hasn't the practice always been to rename the RELENG_= 6=20 > kernel back to 6-STABLE (or whatever) just after the RELENG_6_x branch?= >=20 > Right now it's still labelled 6.2-PRERELEASE. I think we've typically done this in the past but it's not something I see written down anywhere. Frequently we updated release notes and things like that as well, although for 6.2, I'm glad we didn't since the 6.2 release cycle was (is) kind of longish. At this point, I'd just as soon leave it until after 6.2 is released. Bruce. --------------enig81B1470838B97750C9560E1B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpskb2MoxcVugUsMRAhGjAJ4xwPJbA12xqq9W+ttW37ytM226fQCfdrNo WSB79bKY97O2eJuCkWJibGA= =CuB/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig81B1470838B97750C9560E1B--