From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 23 22:49:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7E116A4B3; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:49:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from procyon.firepipe.net (procyon.firepipe.net [198.78.66.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFAC43FDF; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:49:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@csociety.org) Received: by procyon.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 498F32255C; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:49:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:49:33 -0700 From: Will Andrews To: current@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20030924054933.GJ47671@procyon.firepipe.net> Mail-Followup-To: current@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20030924021820.GA55388@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030924053413.GA28722@wombat.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030924053413.GA28722@wombat.localnet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Initial list of ports that fail due to -pthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 05:49:35 -0000 On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:34:13AM -0400, Michael Edenfield wrote: > One very important group of ports that should get looked at when this > gets worked out is KDE. Apparently, Qt uses a different means of > determining wether to use threading, than the ports that depend on it. > The qt-using ports appear to check for -lpthread, then c++ -pthread, and > if neither of those checks pass, disable threading: I have been working with KDE-FreeBSD to make a patch to fix this problem since last week. I am nearly done testing it, so please bear with me and I will get it committed soon. We expect to remove it with the release of KDE 3.2 in a few months as it will be committed to HEAD in KDE. Also, I believe I fixed qt32 on 18 September 2003. It certainly built and works fine on my 5.1-CURRENT 2003/09/19 box. It's just KDE that needs fixing at the moment. I'm typing this in KDE 3.1.4 on said machine. Thanks. Regards, -- wca