From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Aug 20 18:10:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA03439 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 18:10:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA03384 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 18:10:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA28034; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 18:09:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Alfred Perlstein cc: Alex , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, support@yard.de Subject: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD (performances) In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 20 Aug 1998 16:26:55 CDT." Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 18:09:21 -0700 Message-ID: <28031.903661761@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > that's the kernels, btw, about your previous post, every linux user i've > talked to says the NFS is userland. you are sure about it being in > kernel? It can be configured either way. Go poking around in the Redhat 5.1 sources and pay particular attention to the kernel configuration stuff. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message