From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 18 11:11:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55F21E5E for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from system.jails.se (system.jails.se [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc1e:1::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07EED1776 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (system.jails.se [91.205.63.85]) by system.jails.se (Postfix) with SMTP id 06FC8331EC9 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:11:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from klein.pean.org (klein.pean.org [IPv6:2001:16d8:ff9f::60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by system.jails.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6401E331EC3; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:11:23 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: wpa_supplicant problem. From: =?windows-1252?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:11:21 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <83317FFF-5A96-43A3-9AFA-3321434C646C@pean.org> References: <79AEC286-90EB-41D0-8CA8-18A78D53C3C6@pean.org> <8CFBC6B5-B683-4EC3-9561-EFFA6CE55755@pean.org> <52CD0CEE.5010700@pean.org> To: Adrian Chadd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:11:32 -0000 On 08 Jan 2014, at 18:46, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 8 January 2014 00:31, Peter Ankerst=E5l wrote: >> Hehe, >>=20 >> I dont think Im ready for 11 yet. Do you think these fixes will be in = 10 any >> time soon? >=20 > I can try backporting the EAPOL fix(es) to HEAD but it may involve = other fixes. >=20 > I'll take a look. Just as an experiment i tried in my own stupidity to =93implement=94 = your change in r257947 of if_iwn.c and just added the extra if statement, but at last that did not change = anything.=20 /Peter.