From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jan 21 14:50:14 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA11351
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 21 Jan 1996 14:50:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA11346
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 1996 14:50:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA01902; Sun, 21 Jan 1996 14:49:42 -0800
To: Jake Hamby <jehamby@lightside.com>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Still no Java in Netscape?! 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 21 Jan 1996 12:44:38 PST."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.960121124057.326A-100000@localhost> 
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 1996 14:49:42 -0800
Message-ID: <1900.822264582@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I just downloaded Netscape 2.0b6a and am starting to get frustrated that 
> Netscape has Java-enabled EVERY SINGLE UNIX version of Netscape EXCEPT 
> for BSDI...  What are they thinking, it can't be that difficult (although 
> not knowing how their internal class-library implementation is, I can't 
> be positive, but I am pretty sure they're not using that dlopen() call 
> that was their excuse for not Java-enabling it earlier).  Can anyone bend 
> Netscape's ear to add this support sooner?  Jordan?

They need threads.

						Jordan