Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 18:18:21 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, yar@freebsd.org, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Subject: Re: sysutils/cfs Message-ID: <20110904231821.GC22986@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <201109042032.p84KWUIF073409@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <CADLo83_A%2BOh%2Bi4ZFQ=KnZyvBk0h2pf%2BbJnjhYHm=5UyacjE3cA@mail.gmail.com> <201109042032.p84KWUIF073409@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 10:32:30PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > It is not responsible to threaten to remove ports without warning > between releases for non urgent reasons. portmgr has no such policy. Ports get deleted all the time due to various issues. I prefer to see a 1- or 2-month warning via EXPIRATION_DATE, but that's my personal preference, not a written policy. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110904231821.GC22986>