From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 19:38:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5173616A4E2 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 19:38:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rs6.luxsci.com (rs6.luxsci.com [65.61.136.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A610343D2F for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 19:38:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tv@duh.org) Received: from mail.duh.org (adsl-066-156-066-024.sip.asm.bellsouth.net [66.156.66.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by rs6.luxsci.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j23JcH3x000643 verify=NOT); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 13:38:20 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.duh.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j23JbOA7001240; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:37:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:37:24 -0500 (EST) From: Todd Vierling To: Poul-Henning Kamp In-Reply-To: <10479.1109877918@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: References: <10479.1109877918@critter.freebsd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:36:07 +0000 cc: ALeine cc: elric@imrryr.org cc: "Perry E. Metzger" cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: tech-security@NetBSD.org cc: ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: FUD about CGD and GBDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 19:38:42 -0000 On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > At the time where I wrote GBDE, the best that was offered was CGD (and > similar) and users (not cryptographers!) didn't trust it Could you back up this claim, insofar that "users" did not trust cgd? I haven't seen any distrust of cgd -- in fact, I've seen quite a bit of welcome acceptace of cgd by both users *and* cryptographers. -- -- Todd Vierling