From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 2 22:23:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C6BF3E8 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 22:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from biertje.skysmurf.nl (unknown [IPv6:2001:980:27fb:1:21b:78ff:fea8:3f22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF2F1F4 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 22:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from biertje.skysmurf.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by biertje.skysmurf.nl (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t22MN9Zt089944; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 23:23:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fonz@biertje.skysmurf.nl) Received: (from fonz@localhost) by biertje.skysmurf.nl (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t22MN9bd089943; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 23:23:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fonz) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 23:23:09 +0100 From: "A.J. \"Fonz\" van Werven" To: Dave Horsfall Subject: Re: Philip Brown...United Way of Manatee County Message-ID: <20150302222309.GA89895@biertje.skysmurf.nl> References: <1425304808029.6704793.13469848.2353174993@backend.cpro20.com> <54F47642.60007@gmail.com> <54F47DAB.3040206@madpilot.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SUOF0GtieIMvvwua" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 22:23:14 -0000 --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dave Horsfall wrote: > In other words, the FreeBSD lists, by permitting non-subscribers to post= =20 > to them, are spam-magnets. And the spammers know this. Yep. Most FreeBSD mailing lists do not use e.g. greylisting or something along those lines. And as a result, a lot of spam gets through. Personally I would definitely welcome a scheme where new posters need to be approved by moderators who can blacklist spammers and whitelist genuine submitters, but there probably isn't enough manpower to make that happen. I for one would be perfectly happy to help, but it would take (a hell of a lot) more than just little old me to do the job. AvW --=20 I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example. --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU9OLMAAoJEAfP7gJTaCe80rwP/1Cq6eZhaXV/Oz0SIkKzI5sN OOFZ1gOlkttqta9WU4gKoUVRVCM0qD0aF+pgWMBYcLPPv+VLKOeZuTurmE2OqEZz ST72rbURTIPzknODWXx9EKlpy1/NM93EX8GL9LguHQIt0MArU1cf4vvEFcvZkofP evE1SY9mWQcrdSol4FUlPefufA8ySxB4r095vbH3QOP2r8DNnM1qcJKdqD1TIBpw Z+k5X8H+tmA8EUIDboptl0KUyHlPWVI7nKSg0xir+ssYt7XGwbcijaO2+P9XNmJA HVKFh6lyyH1QFiQyOYfy/y5bUxvUEZXQGYty4+sVlxANCP9mHAMW8m4Xej4y0dTT hGHQfV2QX8BZoMmW1j65ZGM15fLNYHFWFz1UZbHSWoP1tV8GBGgfwagcP8zLyhnk FcXhNKK6kA6gz/L5oSXvwLzv1G5qo0TpbVgKkai6ykQqAJx+aHYiuyZ6aH6MRvid e8yuqBSiPY6jix66tOTMtpRn2/lDNUJR9xATLrKI6g8lIur1dg3bHmf4Sgn46WGc 8gb9oim/mx0iA+h3n0iMZoqYcKYN2g9GM88nrFZZKmQn1qcg1giXSGzJQ9NHvlcf Ab4Irp9KPZ9rwHaqVUt2iyX9YXxyhS2h7A4k5TvQDsg+O36Qui1nkG/0lakFQ6oa 5yh3Qf1HeSp7ZXRyBfVw =ecZ4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua--