Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 01:49:16 +0200 From: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pending if_fwip.c patch Message-ID: <200508180149.26632@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <20050817185447.GC16558@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <20050817141436.GB1143@unixpages.org> <20050817185447.GC16558@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2496330.t1mFQQiI0d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Mittwoch, 17. August 2005 20:54 CEST schrieb Brooks Davis: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 04:14:36PM +0200, Christian Brueffer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > can someone commit the attached patch for if_fwip.c? It fixes a panic > > on attach and has been reviewed by dfr@. > > Done. Apparently there's aren't a lot of fwip users of current since I > broke that over a month ago. :( I had done some fwip tests before it was broken, I need ggate over iee1394= =20 for gmirror service. But my (simple) tests showed advantages for fwe=20 regarding performance. If you're looking for testers, I'd give it another try, I prefer active=20 maintained parts over microbenchmark winning ones... Thanks, =2DHarry > > -- Brooks --nextPart2496330.t1mFQQiI0d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDA80GBylq0S4AzzwRAt5rAJ9V/UkgFOknKCHsMSoUWIbUDuOa2gCgjdAV RJ59m6HJg7ZDOD1hwzBw+iQ= =Zaz1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2496330.t1mFQQiI0d--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200508180149.26632>