From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Nov 3 17:40:34 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id RAA25657 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 3 Nov 1995 17:40:34 -0800 Received: from gold.interlog.com (gold.interlog.com [198.53.145.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA25652 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 1995 17:40:31 -0800 Received: from lotbiniere.interlog.com (lotbiniere.interlog.com [198.53.146.76]) by gold.interlog.com (8.6.10/8.6.10) with ESMTP id UAA03395; Fri, 3 Nov 1995 20:40:27 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lotbiniere.interlog.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA02517; Fri, 3 Nov 1995 20:46:21 -0500 Message-Id: <199511040146.UAA02517@lotbiniere.interlog.com> X-Authentication-Warning: lotbiniere.interlog.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol From: "Michel Joly de Lotbiniere" Reply-to: "Michel Joly de Lotbiniere" To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFD: VFS, non-Intel architectures In-reply-to: Message from Poul-Henning Kamp of "Fri, 03 Nov 1995 12:15:32 +0100." <2258.815397332@critter.tfs.com> Date: Fri, 03 Nov 1995 20:46:19 -0500 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > From: Poul-Henning Kamp > Subject: Re: RFD: VFS, non-Intel architectures [snip] > > Come on Terry, show us, prove that you can deliver what your mouth > keeps babling about, show us a kernel that boots on a Power at Xmas > and have a complete selfhosted port ready by easter... > > "but mom, he's not wearing any clothes..." > [snip] Oh, come off it! Is this kind of muscle-flexing of any value as a response to a proposal? Here's a guy who obviously eats, drinks, and sleeps with Unix kernels, offering to do a port to another architecture, and all you can say is this??? sorry to waste bandwidth, but REALLY!!!! manners... ========================= Michel Joly de Lotbiniere mjdl@interlog.com =========================