From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 12 03:24:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC45A1065670 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:24:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2128FC0C for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:24:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so4116004rvf.43 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:24:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:received:date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=CMH6CBcPQS33eMT4odDbX+e+ROk9lqfupeBEr1SIDvc=; b=KMQsfaXvQeXiJBdjPYK0Ftjsoq34naF945WRDzhtJH7408FsxcDOIRn0PqFM03FH4E 5W2xdw4/LWUCFMhhYQnczZvocewb/kslJvH2FwhTyl1m/O+4tnVxtrdeoYVvjjyrlaCL mph3/f+J2UhiDRKnXq8nr9910vbmFR8+Hq7Q8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ujV8KpCXH9ONBn1UKynUlNj4Bow/yZUeeDmzYeuCgGu8NBlT5h79hPfeC4Z2MNnsV3 ZXW6Bri0w83tYLRa+Qrx1HQ+hD3N0RajvZZLPYUnU5lvBtvTrgBIfyN0TQ+E+onnHa+E +RQrnmcvN0JLewPSvUaRjIw1SyQi6jY9DN4l8= Received: by 10.141.193.1 with SMTP id v1mr531407rvp.73.1213241078436; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ( [211.53.35.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g31sm910063rvb.2.2008.06.11.20.24.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m5C3MTDO007985 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:22:29 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id m5C3MS8i007984; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:22:28 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:22:28 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: Gerrit K?hn Message-ID: <20080612032228.GD7250@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20080527165232.2acbb00f.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <3C916EEA-5A2B-4C88-B834-0F47D7D525FA@gmail.com> <20080611092457.82c83083.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080611092457.82c83083.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Daniele Bastianini , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: broken re(4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:24:39 -0000 On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:24:57AM +0200, Gerrit K?hn wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:43:04 +0200 Daniele Bastianini > wrote about Re: broken re(4): > > DB> > - copying large files (more than some 100MB) via ssh/scp drops the > DB> > connection due to "corrupted MAC on input": > DB> > Disconnecting: Corrupted MAC on input. > DB> > lost connection > > DB> I had the same problem. > DB> I fixed it (for now) making a buildworld with > DB> *default date=2008.03.01.00.00.00 in my src csup configuration. > > DB> I'm not so skilled to investigate in the sources but the problem is > DB> after this date. > > For me all versions from cvs and all patches from Pyun are working now, > after I have solved the issue with the bad riser card. I still think it's > funny that the riser causes this kind of trouble for the networking chips. > > On the other hand, I have not been able to get more than about 10MByte/s > through the interfaces of this particular system. I have 1GBit-networking > equipment, and the other systems (which are used as router) have no > problem doing a throughput of >20MB/s. Even bonding the two interfaces > using lagg(4) does not improve the performance - where else could be the > bottleneck? Before checking performance of network controller you had to rule out other factors like disk I/O. Use one of benchmark programs in ports/benchmark. > The only difference here is that I have the extra SATA-controller with > disks in there. However, the disks appear to be as fast as I can expect > from a SATA150-interface. > -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon