From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 25 20:35:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A356516A402 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofp-freebsd-performance@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5649313C442 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofp-freebsd-performance@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HLQ5I-00075r-OL for freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:35:04 +0100 Received: from 89-172-63-188.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.63.188]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:35:04 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-63-188.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:35:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:34:45 +0100 Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: <20070224215508.GA41968@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E13410.7020505@he.iki.fi> <20070225071946.GA48242@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E14BAD.80909@he.iki.fi> <20070225084737.GA49231@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070225092947.GA49489@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070225202058.GA77835@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0FE54BD3BF5E89608506E882" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-63-188.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) In-Reply-To: <20070225202058.GA77835@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:35:18 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0FE54BD3BF5E89608506E882 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kris Kennaway wrote: > I'm saying that the 7.0-CVS sources, which are graphed, are unlikely > to differ significantly from 6.2-CVS, i.e. they do not show good > scaling on this benchmark because of the problems with filedesc > locking in CVS. Ok, got it, but the second question is: where is it? Graph on http://jeffr-tech.livejournal.com/6268.html includes only three FreeBSD-7 configurations, and all show nice scaling. --------------enig0FE54BD3BF5E89608506E882 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF4fLlldnAQVacBcgRAmCPAJ9ABVsUiL3ztKVilJkMH4HfQmgRsACgoBIN P4bY0PwnlJ43AV6wT2H8wzY= =rggs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0FE54BD3BF5E89608506E882--