From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 13 21:28:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC174106566C for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:28:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacombar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A288FC1C for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwe3 with SMTP id 3so2380994wwe.31 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:28:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IPkt6mbq7bBUGunTL9m7WHisv25emD5DI52o0Fx1NT8=; b=GuXxWDOIZhdyBzN8T8fu8OxJB6zq3sxPMDCkCMdGIT7ywFyUTgwBJ2YCegq7LlBPZY y1ZaPOvxHZvY2Rv5nk5W0S3DPDdM7IYgy/EZjyPjTmpALOUjM3glZHOHtFZ4DNbuwtQT evUL6iJ1PLhDucWo3pbWAppgjRvSV3c2nOwpw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.32.73 with SMTP id b9mr748018wbd.49.1318541335254; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:28:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.103.198 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:28:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <001f01cc89ec$d44a5470$7cdefd50$@com> References: <001f01cc89ec$d44a5470$7cdefd50$@com> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:28:55 -0400 Message-ID: From: Arnaud Lacombe To: Pegasus Mc Cleaft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compatibility with 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:28:56 -0000 Hi, On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrot= e: > Hi Current, > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Should the new Beta 3 have "options COMPAT_FREEBSD8" in th= e GENERIC > kernel config file? Or, does this happen when it goes RC? > What would you expect this option to cover ? I'd assume that no ABI[0] have been broken between FreeBSD 8 and FreeBSD 9. If ABI had been broken, the developer should have been responsible enough to create the proper compatibility shim and would already have introduced COMPAT_FREEBSD9. Of course, this leaves options for ABI being broken, compatibility shim introduced, but COMPAT_FREEBSD9 not introduced :) - Arnaud [0]: all the mentions of "ABI" exclude KVM. > Ta > Peg > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " >