From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 7 09:55:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A16106564A for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 09:55:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D19D8FC0C for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 09:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-60-31.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.60.31]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA993CEB3; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 11:55:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q679tmHO002393; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 11:55:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 11:55:48 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Wojciech Puchar Message-Id: <20120707115548.52fbf5f3.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <4FF71637.9030206@d3photography.com> <20471.8240.321332.987229@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4FF724AF.9090602@ose.nl> <20120706202558.2a6d7e42.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Bas Smeelen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD start slices at head boundaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 09:55:50 -0000 On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 11:15:44 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > it without any problem. It _may_ be possible that some > > systems like "Windows" have trouble with this approach, > > what trouble? Windows doesn't probably see anything. I have _no_ idea. Systems behaving in a manner you cannot expect or predict are hard to tell in what they could do wrong on a "non-standard" setting (from their point of view of course). > anyway i would not risk running windows with FreeBSD containing disk > connected at the same time anyway. it's always risky. It maybe suggests to "repair" it... :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...