From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 22:10:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9040233 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:10:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com (mail-ie0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B69DD1A8C for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:10:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id tp5so2707053ieb.21 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:10:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:from:content-type:message-id:date:to :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Ug8U62PFxRvBUM3T67Zs1/e+OWmAn+QhEJI8mDkUeco=; b=ehOXht8NT5/8pgSYT1HsGez+i5gpJugwYEEkiLjm/azNabJvhWh+5ps1mjoZl93z7r vVm2VSn41hPDPEDY7zZXDnbI+4SIiSBPP1X1RTp7NVjWG+GG9S0pghkBJiK7KJaNUtAg n0wWxDR5FwREda8wQ/YOebpai0Guh6qX/9P+0MH0/lWME+VTVRtT1JhRY3B09EZUnHo0 r+zZNnVaE88kphdJb0glZ8qaO7j84Ty4bMI/JZHqFirR4gIU5md503q8Ew6qv/81nqVy 0AVL7LwwDGHSZ+jkDmUdtW/+Awg2SxC4KXkecEIkDOX0M2wUo0i0PdZoIWa2LltP1555 MrMA== X-Received: by 10.50.103.5 with SMTP id fs5mr14077591igb.24.1391033404011; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:10:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.2.129.223] ([166.137.84.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fk5sm72318967igb.9.2014.01.29.14.10.02 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:10:03 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1 From: Joshua Smith Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11B554a) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:10:03 -0500 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:10:05 -0000 Just curious why one would use natd instead of the in kernel nat available a= s either part of ipfw or pf.=20 Regards, -- Josh Smith KD8HRX Email/jabber: juicewvu@gmail.com Phone: 304.237.9369(c) Sent from my iPhone.=20