From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 09:15:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14B01065729 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from sakura.ccs.furiru.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:8060::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4F68FC18 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (authenticated bits=0) by sakura.ccs.furiru.org (unknown) with ESMTP id mBJ9FWm9029178; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:15:35 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:15:32 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20081219.181532.241936859.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: xcllnt@mac.com From: Takahashi Yoshihiro In-Reply-To: <4EA5F491-CC52-43EC-AC03-F50F8B2D6186@mac.com> References: <200812171743.mBHHhMd3010561@svn.freebsd.org> <20081218.194137.191463900.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> <4EA5F491-CC52-43EC-AC03-F50F8B2D6186@mac.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gpart X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:15:38 -0000 In article <4EA5F491-CC52-43EC-AC03-F50F8B2D6186@mac.com> Marcel Moolenaar writes: > >> 4. It's failed to recognize a big SCSI disk as BSD slice. > > Can you elaborate. Please see: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2008-September/008627.html The da0 has a BSD slice. GEOM_BSD/GEOM_PC98 recognize it correctly. But the gpart does not. From debug printf (dmesg.txt), it seems that the gpart read incorrect sector. > >> 5. A (bit strange) FAT slice is recoginized as BSD slice. > > This is probably a priority issue between bsd and pc98. > (and thus a priority issue between mbr and pc98). In > particular, g_part_bsd returns G_PART_PROBE_PRI_HIGH. > It looks like g_part_pc98 needs to have the highest > priority. I'll send you a patch for review shortly. Thanks. --- TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro