From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Nov 7 7:58:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from straylight.ringlet.net (sentinel.office1.bg [217.75.134.126]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 721B737B418 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 07:58:12 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 9380 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Nov 2001 15:57:51 -0000 Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 17:57:51 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev To: David O'Brien Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should we keep the vim5 port? Message-ID: <20011107175751.B8623@straylight.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , ports@freebsd.org References: <20011107074751.A93028@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011107074751.A93028@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@freebsd.org on Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:47:51AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:47:51AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > Now that Vim 6.0 is out (with most .0 bug fixes); do we still need the > vim5 port? I personally think we should keep it a bit longer, for fools like myself who are wary of bloat and hidden bugs in the new versions :) G'luck, Peter -- If I had finished this sentence, To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message