From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 28 19:36:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62DD83722F9 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:36:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BGRkp3hdTz3Xfs for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:36:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=rcn.com; s=20180516; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@rcn.com; t=1595965008; h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=0yF1e96dVu+JZBo7tclN53WoIuA=; b=I7hzqqM7xMMB04VVp9AL+cYLRBl1rLUcvoVvBRDx5XY1YKi/hUpRTzWAeHAZe3qM FGLoGCMFUXz0aTnXr2WRCU1hsWIoCUiz3q8UBbYb+NT1dqkKFw3F8XUpdNtxF1z6 3nVZg9E6lUzfaK1c6ZH6t8NMPHSscRN/xm+n6Qo25mRBJ/gQBle59J5BgqMgJKnx UHDDqrC5638mI4gbsgArcHglJNIh4+nTWQ8krL77A/Rm0bCL60Ly90jV+akj5EEq UxbQAw2Xk/DxUqQSY3S3/Qsi7vLhcQGoUxfgnOhxxEOTBruNyjjF9J709URDW+tY LIo9MAAAqk6Nw03vROZ++g==; X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=J+PUEzvS c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=9TgA2UwI6Wy+6BV4wQM/cQ==:117 a=9TgA2UwI6Wy+6BV4wQM/cQ==:17 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=XRQyMpdBKAEA:10 a=_RQrkK6FrEwA:10 a=48faUk6PgeAA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=FGcBbAwTQXDJWBcSKHkA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: cm9iZXJ0aHVmZkByY24uY29t Received: from [209.6.230.48] ([209.6.230.48:42960] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.25.56547 r(Core:3.6.25.0)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384) id 66/8F-42436-F4E702F5; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:36:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <24352.32335.332652.269037@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:36:47 -0400 From: Robert Huff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: change in tcsh behavior In-Reply-To: References: <24351.11091.522286.251422@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <24351.24025.555285.682585@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <24352.4650.708202.473784@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 26.3 (amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BGRkp3hdTz3Xfs X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=rcn.com header.s=20180516 header.b=I7hzqqM7; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=rcn.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of roberthuff@rcn.com designates 69.168.97.78 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=roberthuff@rcn.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.72 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[rcn.com:s=20180516]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[69.168.97.78:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:69.168.97.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.993]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[rcn.com:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.95)[-0.951]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[rcn.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[rcn.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.68)[-0.680]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36271, ipnet:69.168.97.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[69.168.97.78:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:36:51 -0000 matthew@FreeBSD.org writes: > The OP is running 13-CURRENT. That's the bleeding edge, > development version. New stuff appears in CURRENT all the time, > possibly with little more notice than a review on Phabricator or a > short e-mail exchange. Some of what appears is initially buggy. > Some is experimental and ultimately ends up completely different. > As someone who has chosen to use the development version, you are > expected to be able to cope. OP here: The gentleman's point is well taken, and I will proceed directly to self-recrimination phase. My thanks to every one for their assistance. Apologetically, Robert Huff