Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:23:31 +0000
From:      Ihor Antonov <ihor@antonovs.family>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: poudriere odd error
Message-ID:  <038EC8C3-DB5E-43BD-9F4E-2E31C3120BC9@antonovs.family>
In-Reply-To: <Yxk0CudRvUmvm%2BRx@void.f-m.fm>
References:  <Yxk0CudRvUmvm%2BRx@void.f-m.fm>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On September 8, 2022 12:15:06 AM UTC, void <void@f-m=2Efm> wrote:
>Hi, I hope this is the appropriate list for this query=2E I think I'm rig=
ht thinking that poudriere would be used by lots of devs?
>
>I'm seeing the following output when poudriere starts
>
>ptsort: cycle involving doxygen-1=2E9=2E5,2 and py39-breathe-4=2E34=2E0
>ptsort: cycle involving libgd-2=2E3=2E3_1,1 and graphviz-2=2E50=2E0_9
>ptsort: cycle involving texlive-base-20210325_7 and texlive-texmf-2021032=
5
>ptsort: cycle involving texlive-base-20210325_7 and doxygen-1=2E9=2E5,2
>[00:06:30] Balancing pool
>
>It then carries on building=2E
>
>Is it a port problem, poudriere problem or a problem with the ports tree?
>Need I worry?
>
>TIA,

This looks like a problem with ports=2E It tells you about cyclic dependen=
cies between packages=2E It doesnt know whic package to build because of th=
e dependecy cycle=2E

Ihor



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?038EC8C3-DB5E-43BD-9F4E-2E31C3120BC9>