From owner-freebsd-hardware  Wed Dec 18 00:09:02 1996
Return-Path: <owner-hardware>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id AAA23337
          for hardware-outgoing; Wed, 18 Dec 1996 00:09:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pegasus.com (pegasus.com [140.174.243.13])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id AAA23329
          for <freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 1996 00:08:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pegasus.com (8.6.8/PEGASUS-2.2)
	id WAA21096; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 22:08:35 -1000
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 22:08:35 -1000
From: richard@pegasus.com (Richard Foulk)
Message-Id: <199612180808.WAA21096@pegasus.com>
In-Reply-To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert)
       "Re: EDO parit RAM (Was Re: Tyan ...)" (Dec 17, 11:21pm)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: EDO parit RAM (Was Re: Tyan ...)
Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

} > What's wrong with ECC mode only memory?  Where can you find parity
} 
} 15% loss of performance if I remember well. See the archives of the list.
} 

That seems doubtful.  How about 15% on main memory accesses -- most
accesses are from cache.

This sounds like the EDO gain that turned out to be 1%.


Richard