Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 16:21:38 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Who needs Perl? We do! Message-ID: <199611212321.QAA12775@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <l03010604aeba90dead5d@[204.69.236.50]> References: <l03010603aeba84fae19b@[204.69.236.50]> <199611212046.NAA13887@phaeton.artisoft.com> <199611211714.SAA01528@ravenock.cybercity.dk> <199611212141.OAA12035@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199611212245.PAA12448@rocky.mt.sri.com> <l03010604aeba90dead5d@[204.69.236.50]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Richard Wackerbarth writes: > >Heck, show me a working prototype that has 4 levels. > > > > Top level > > / \ > > Subdir1 Subdir2 > > / / \ > > P1 P2 ssubdir3 > > / \ > > P3 P4 > > > >Proof that you're way is 'better' is all that we're asking for. > > I have offered "samples" before, but that offer was rejected. I've never seen an offer before, so I can't comment. > The demand > was that I demonstrate by showing it work on EVERYTHING. (ie fete complete) > If you are willing to accept a sanitized "demo" which shows how I would > handle the "recursive" nature of the present system, I can do that without > "fixing" any of the current code. A "sample" library and a tool or two are > all that should be required. Show me the above, and we'll go from there. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611212321.QAA12775>