From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 9 22:07:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1827B16A418 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 22:07:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE0C43D82 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 22:07:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [10.10.3.185] ([69.15.205.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k59M7gY5040929; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 16:07:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <4489F129.1050304@samsco.org> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 16:07:37 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060206 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug White References: <20060605212952.T96853@thunder.xecu.net> <20060609145451.F60598@carver.gumbysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20060609145451.F60598@carver.gumbysoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: Andy Dills , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Suggestions for Adaptec SAS AIC9410 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 22:07:57 -0000 Doug White wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Andy Dills wrote: > >> >> I'm trying to get a Supermicro 6024H-32R setup with 6.1, but I'm >> discovering that the Adaptec SAS AIC9410 controller isn't yet supported. >> >> I see one brief thread about it on this mailing list back in March, >> but no >> further mention or conclusive details. There was talk of MFCing the mpt >> driver...is anybody using this in production? > > > Can you get a pciconf -lv off this system? It might just be a case of > needing to add an ID to an existing driver (aac?). > No, the 9410 is a SAS HBA chip. It's actually meant to be used just in Adaptec HostRAID (software RAID) mode, but writing a standalone driver is possible, albeit fairly difficult and time consuming. Scott