From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 20 15:26:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCDA16A479; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:26:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@freebsd.org) Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (bantam.cisco.com [64.102.19.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB3B43D45; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:26:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@freebsd.org) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from rooster.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id k5KFQGt25587; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:26:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.1.1.160] (jclarke-vpn.cisco.com [172.18.173.17]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id k5KFQFB25565; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:26:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <44981397.2050900@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:26:15 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke Organization: FreeBSD, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Macintosh/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Evenson References: <44966060.8040509@gmx.at> <4496CBD6.1090204@freebsd.org> <4497D3E8.2070105@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <4497D3E8.2070105@gmx.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: evolution-2.6.2/evolution-exchange-2.6.2 seems to be borked X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:26:18 -0000 Mark Evenson wrote: > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >> Mark Evenson wrote: >>> martinko wrote: >>>> Mark Evenson wrote: > [...] >> Just go to http://bugzilla.gome.org. It's easy to file a bug. Be >> sure to include the full backtrace when you do. >> >> Joe >> > > Sort of easy, I'd say. > > Which backtrace do you include for a multithreaded application? All of > them? And when I attach gdb, I seem to get different behavior than > without. thread apply all bt Or: thread apply all bt full Joe -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome