From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Jun 16 08:22:02 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA14437
          for questions-outgoing; Sun, 16 Jun 1996 08:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA14425
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 16 Jun 1996 08:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA26237; Sun, 16 Jun 1996 09:21:40 -0600
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 1996 09:21:40 -0600
From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199606161521.JAA26237@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: Sean Batson <valtech@caribnet.net>
Cc: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: defrags
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960616055227.169A-100000@PPP2F.sunbeach.net>
References: <199606110043.RAA05303@phaeton.artisoft.com>
	<Pine.BSF.3.91.960616055227.169A-100000@PPP2F.sunbeach.net>
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> You guys said I shouldn't worry about the 0.7% but its now
> 0.9% and increasing each time I shutdown the software down
> and restart.

It may get as high as 2%, but that's pretty trivial compared to what
you'll have on a DOS fs about 10 minutes after you start it.

It's so trivial that you can consider the fragmentation irrelevant.


Nate