From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Aug 19 10:49:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from castle.netlink.co.uk (castle.netlink.co.uk [194.88.140.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727EF159D7 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 10:48:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from geoffb@castle.netlink.co.uk) Received: (from geoffb@localhost) by castle.netlink.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA24150; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 19:03:33 +0100 (BST) From: Geoff Buckingham Message-Id: <199908191803.TAA24150@castle.netlink.co.uk> Subject: Re: BSDi (binaries give bus error again/still) In-Reply-To: <199908191719.KAA18736@vashon.polstra.com> from John Polstra at "Aug 19, 99 10:19:14 am" To: jdp@polstra.com (John Polstra) Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 19:03:32 +0100 (BST) Cc: emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > In article <199908191707.SAA22123@castle.netlink.co.uk>, > Geoff Buckingham wrote: > > > > I am assured it does work in 2.2.8 anyone know what has happend ? > > It must be a very old binary -- i.e., built under an old version of > BSD/OS. Such binaries didn't allow for system-specific address > space differences. They had a certain address hard-coded into them. > > Binaries built under BSD/OS 3.0 definitely work on my 3.2 system. > It has been suggested I back out of the kernel address space changes to get this to work. Is http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/FAQ262.html#265 correct or has the 1GB come back into STABLE now ? (Basically what sized address space is correct for such binaries?) -- GeoffB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message