From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 14:43:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3701065672; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:43:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [91.121.44.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53088FC17; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:43:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (81-65-128-47.rev.numericable.fr [81.65.128.47]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 02654633301; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:43:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282B8C3A6; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:43:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:43:33 +0100 From: Patrick =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Lamaizi=E8re?= To: Lars Engels Message-ID: <20090213154333.18f0bf13@baby-jane.lamaiziere.net> In-Reply-To: <20090212213443.GM30761@e.0x20.net> References: <20090210134421.350f40b8@baby-jane.lamaiziere.net> <20090212213443.GM30761@e.0x20.net> Organization: /dave/nulle X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backport of glxsb(4) to RELENG_6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:43:36 -0000 Le Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:34:43 +0100, Lars Engels : Hi, > I just tried it, but I get this message: > glxsb0: mem > 0xefff4000-0xefff7fff irq 9 at device 1.2 on pci0 > glxsb0: cannot allocate DMA memory of 32768 bytes (12) I think you are very low on memory and the driver cannot allocate his DMA-able buffer (error 12=ENOMEM) This is not really a bug. But i've found another problem related to the taskqueue. I'm doing a fake driver to be able to test on a vmware machine.