From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Tue Oct 27 01:28:50 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D656A1C06A
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 27 Oct 2015 01:28:50 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A00515C0
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 01:28:50 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t9R1Snva028313
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 01:28:49 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 196361] IPv6 routes leak between FIBs
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 01:28:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: kern
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-RELEASE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: jhujhiti@adjectivism.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-196361-2472-TkWgFQ18kQ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-196361-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-196361-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 01:28:50 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361

--- Comment #3 from jhujhiti@adjectivism.org ---
Sorry - I should have been more verbose. I agree with your assessment. What
doesn't make sense to me is the logic in the code that clearly intends to add
these routes to all FIBs. The logic existed in the merge at r231852, and I
don't see the code ever changing, so I'm not sure how it's a regression (I did
see your mailing list post - in fact bz@, the committer of r231852, was the one
who said it's a regression).

There is plenty of other good multi-FIB code in IPv6 areas of the kernel, so I
must be missing a good reason for this behavior to exist.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.