From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 15:48:18 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id A5CF016A524; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C6416A4E8 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:48:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075FC13C4A7 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:48:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from zion.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C581A4D9A; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:48:17 -0700 (PDT) From: John Baldwin To: Roman Divacky Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:48:10 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200708200201.l7K21c3v034586@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070820091136.GA47764@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20070820091136.GA47764@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709261048.11221.jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Jesper Brix Rosenkilde , Perforce Change Reviews Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 125372 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:48:19 -0000 On Monday 20 August 2007 05:11:36 am Roman Divacky wrote: > > + PROC_LOCK(p); > > outsysshm.pid = p->p_pid; > > - strncpy(outsysshm.progtitle, p->p_comm, MAXCOMLEN); > > - strncpy(outsysshm.proctitle, "\0", 1); > > - copyout((caddr_t) &outsysshm, (caddr_t) *addr, sizeof(struct sysshm)); > > + copyout(&outsysshm, (vm_offset_t *) p->p_usrsysshm, > > + sizeof(struct sysshm)); > > + PROC_UNLOCK(p); > > I dont think you can copyout while holding proc lock. Correct, but as per my earlier e-mail, the locking isn't needed anyway. -- John Baldwin