From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Jul  4 08:17:14 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA01586
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jul 1996 08:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com ([206.127.76.100])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA01580
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 1996 08:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA00444; Thu, 4 Jul 1996 09:16:50 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 1996 09:16:50 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199607041516.JAA00444@rocky.mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To: Alex Le Heux <alexlh@yourchoice.nl>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Has ipfw changed since 2.1.0-REL?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960704150448.9386M-100000@sarah>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960704150448.9386M-100000@sarah>
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> If it's been improved since then, I won't waste my time messing around 
> with the code myself.

It's been changed *ALOT* since 2.1R, so much that none of your old IPFW
rules will even be relevant anymore, although they can be used for
reference.


Nate