From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 5 16:27:55 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA01915 for current-outgoing; Mon, 5 Jan 1998 16:27:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA01892 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 1998 16:27:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id QAA28832; Mon, 5 Jan 1998 16:27:15 -0800 (PST) To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: Garrett Wollman , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Time to retire fetch? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 05 Jan 1998 17:57:17 +0100." <309.884019437@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 1998 16:27:15 -0800 Message-ID: <28829.884046435@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Fair enough - I think the sentiments are clear. Fetch stays! Jordan > In message <199801051509.KAA23284@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Garrett Wollman wri te > s: > >< >m> said: > > > >> I just noticed that FTP in -current now supports http:// style > >> fetches, a feature which seems to have crept in under my nose during > >> the sync with NetBSD's ftp client. > > For once I agree with Garrett (this has become a disturbing trend > lately, I must be getting older or something... :-). > > Ftp is named after the protocol it implements, and it should that way... > > Fetch is more open for interpretation. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member > phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."