From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun  5 17:38:23 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA44E149
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri,  5 Jun 2015 17:38:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com)
Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A5A71DAB
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri,  5 Jun 2015 17:38:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com)
Received: from tom.home (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by kib.kiev.ua (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t55HcEnS048578
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
 Fri, 5 Jun 2015 20:38:14 +0300 (EEST)
 (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 kib.kiev.ua t55HcEnS048578
Received: (from kostik@localhost)
 by tom.home (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t55HcECY048577;
 Fri, 5 Jun 2015 20:38:14 +0300 (EEST)
 (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com
 using -f
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 20:38:14 +0300
From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Kuzminsky <S.Kuzminsky@F5.com>
Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Bug in FreeBSD 10.1's pthread barrier implementation?
Message-ID: <20150605173814.GF2499@kib.kiev.ua>
References: <D1973644.8FD0%seb@f5.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D1973644.8FD0%seb@f5.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no
 autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on tom.home
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 17:38:23 -0000

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 05:19:32PM +0000, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> I'm running in to a situation where pthread_barrier_t is not completely initialized, and later pthread_barrier_destroy() fails.
> 
> The attached patch (against FreeBSD 10.1) fixes the issue for me.

This was already fixed by r278313/head and r278668/stable/10.