From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 15 8:46:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mta2.snfc21.pbi.net (mta2.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F03637BAAA for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 08:46:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jazepeda@pacbell.net) Received: from zippy.dyn.ml.org ([207.214.149.45]) by mta2.snfc21.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.09.16.21.57.p8) with ESMTP id <0FRH000OI2G3UC@mta2.snfc21.pbi.net> for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 08:43:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.dyn.ml.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D750B7C000; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 08:43:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 08:43:13 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Zepeda Subject: Re: Linksys Revisted.. In-reply-to: <000b01bf8e37$c5bff3a0$2260e4d0@scorched.com> To: Jay Oliver Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Jay Oliver wrote: > Ok... how is it possible to identify different revisions? As far as I can > tell, the cards are being reported to be identical, though they're almost > certainly not. And since they both worked fine under 'pn', will it be > possible in the future to have support for the current non working revision > via dc? Look at the output of the dc driver. One is probed as a PNIC blah blah blah the other as a PNIC II. On the cards themselves different chips are used. Under 3.x, one would attach to the pn driver, one would not, etc, etc. - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message