From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 17 13:49:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F5B416A409 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:49:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lveax.m@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C17713C442 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:49:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lveax.m@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1251004wxd for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:49:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SEMo51rDuBlaqu+xl8e/kODl7c3j9E856hyM/i8QGg5d4HT+yzgT3m0/C7jpyEOsWBzTGwVevU5yjmoFRbU4TKMBxSupcAXbqw3Kvf1i5hKXk6E7JEikxWbKckT4jO9geObBHDpsCxfK6n7P0u/6l5rkDos7jjiqmB1LvG2+da4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cwFh3wfqJTqXkY61rdqHHsLMb6lgl0GM/rt9p8IKE4859h7+17MJpSdqG2GqcOW/gI6OC/BNgZW2YHy0RkCkdp8qVNMz1rYYmwfKkgrcGedCvOBxQ0RJIxn3iJtVdGk6RLAPF61PjOwj5OdJ4yiOgjz+zLQM0GwObD//A8k3vfk= Received: by 10.90.100.2 with SMTP id x2mr330643agb.1184678692666; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:24:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.86.8 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:24:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <576dcbc20707170624kb671fe4ia5ddac21af93eccd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:24:52 +0800 From: lveax To: "Claus Guttesen" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070716233030.D92541@10.0.0.1> <469CACEC.1000103@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE/SCHED_SMP diff for 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:49:35 -0000 > > sched_ule: > > -j 3 buildkernel: 13:23 > -j 4 buildkernel: 12:38 > -j 5 buildkernel: 12:41 > -j 6 buildkernel: 12:47 > > sched_4bsd: > -j 3 buildkernel: 11:43 > -j 4 buildkernel: 12:02 > > So sched_ule seems to handle more processes slightly better than 4bsd > albeit it does it slower. ule's sweet spot is -j 4 and 4bsd is -j 3. > scribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > 4bsd vs ULE -j 3 buildkernel: 11:43 vs -j 3 buildkernel: 13:23 -j 4 buildkernel: 12:02 vs -j 4 buildkernel: 12:38 ULE is always slower?