From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 18:18:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id 5AEBE1065674; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:18:51 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: Alexander Leidinger Message-ID: <20110811181851.GB91223@freebsd.org> References: <201108101528.p7AFSYhC066258@freefall.freebsd.org> <20110810220453.000016d9@unknown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110810220453.000016d9@unknown> Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org, gnats@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/159646: [linux] [patch] bump Linux version in linuxulator X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:18:51 -0000 On Wed Aug 10 11, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > do you have a list of feature-changes between 2.6.16 and 2.6.32? Bonus > points for a list of features the FreeBSD kernel does not support > yet. ;-) syscall wise i posted this link on the freebsd linuxulator wiki quite a while ago: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/syscalls.2.html it lists all linux syscalls and when they were introduced. of course that doesn't help with defunct syscalls in the linuxulator or missing ipc/ioctl/futex stuff, but it's a start. ;) cheers. alex ps: i think one of the best examples that the linuxulator isn't sufficient for current linux apps, is firefox. get the linux binary of either 5.x or 6.x and enjoy the crash. ;) > > Did you test this with the linux_base-f10 ports on a normal FreeBSD > system? If yes, what did you test? > > Bye, > Alexander. > > -- > http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 > http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137