Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:23:20 -0800 (PST) From: Rob <spamrefuse@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: xorg-libraries installs libXcursor.so.1, but libXcursor.so.1.0.2 is hardcoded Message-ID: <20051031152320.83576.qmail@web36205.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, The xorg-libraries port installs the file "/usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1". However, in xc/lib/X11/Imakefile the version "1.0.2" is hardcoded: SOXCURSORREV=1.0.2 XCURSOR_DEFINES = -DUSE_DYNAMIC_XCURSOR -DLIBXCURSOR=\"libXcursor.so.$(SOXCURSORREV)\" which is then used in xc/lib/X11/CrGlCur.c: static char libraryName[] = LIBXCURSOR; This is rater odd: why installing libXcursor.so.1, but hardcoded looking for libXcursor.so.1.0.2 ? Yes, I know that in CrGlCur.c, the open_library() function will try subsequently libXcursor.so.1.0.2, libXcursor.so.1.0 and libXcursor.so.1, until it succeeds with the last one.... So when it's hardcoded, why not doing it right in the first place, and hardcode libXcursor.so.1 instead ? Is this a bug/mistake? Regards, Rob. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051031152320.83576.qmail>