From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 22 17:33:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A188637B401 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 17:33:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79D543FCB for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 17:33:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1988C0-000CCP-8d; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 01:32:56 +0100 Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h3N0WtPe066995; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 01:32:55 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h3N0WtOK066994; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 01:32:55 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 01:32:54 +0100 From: Jonathon McKitrick To: Colin Percival Message-ID: <20030423003254.GB66803@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20030422132906.GB64101@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <5.0.2.1.1.20030422171035.01c5e258@popserver.sfu.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.1.20030422171035.01c5e258@popserver.sfu.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Spam-Score: -15.2 (---------------) X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *1988C0-000CCP-8d*2G4YkDrUz62* cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Code layout and debugging time X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 00:33:18 -0000 On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 05:22:18PM +0100, Colin Percival wrote: : in heavily commented code; I have a feeling that one might find that : writing comments into a distinct "documentation" file would have an : advantage over the usual practice of writing comments in the middle of code. Isn't there something called JavaDoc that follows this idea? jcm -- Consulting: If you aren't part of the solution, there is a lot of money to be made in prolonging the problem.