From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Feb  6 06:21:09 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA10365
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 06:21:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bmcgover-pc.cisco.com (bmcgover-pc.cisco.com [171.69.104.147])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA10353
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 06:20:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bmcgover-pc.cisco.com (bmcgover@localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by bmcgover-pc.cisco.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with ESMTP id JAA01590; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 09:18:22 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199702061418.JAA01590@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com>
To: dg@root.com
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Stomp the bug!!!! (Was cyclades bug) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Feb 1997 14:00:50 PST."
             <199702052200.OAA11374@root.com> 
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 09:18:22 -0500
From: Brian McGovern <bmcgover@cisco.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

David,
	One last thought. (BTW, I'm assuming you'll commit the change I sent
in... If not, let me know :) ). If we tinkered with locore.s and pmap.c to
remove the PG_N (?) flag to try to fix this problem, would there be any
reason not to put them back in assuming they would a.) improve performance 
someplace, and b.) not cause additional problems down the road? Again, just
a thought...

	-Brian