From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 30 19:13:58 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D97A16A4CE
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:13:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (meitner.wh.Uni-Dortmund.DE
	[129.217.129.133])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9748143D39
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:13:57 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net)
Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (pc2-105.intern.meitner [10.3.12.105])
	by meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 84DDD167522; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:13:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by lofi.dyndns.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6UJD32l050507
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
	Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:13:04 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net)
From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:12:58 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <20040727122823.40c6c3c5@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
	<20040730165444.GA36115@sanatana.dharma> <20040730184715.GA768@galgenberg.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040730184715.GA768@galgenberg.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1;
  boundary="Boundary-02=_+2pCBvW5CJMjBkX";
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200407302113.02313.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
cc: Radim Kolar <hsn@netmag.cz>
Subject: Re: configuring ports via Makefile.local
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:13:58 -0000


--Boundary-02=_+2pCBvW5CJMjBkX
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 30 July 2004 20:47, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:

> Please NO! OPTIONS are very ugly, IMHO. Imagine installing a new system
> and running a massive portinstall. The only real solutions IMHO are the
> make.conf approach

It's funny how people always critisize OPTIONS for just the wrong reasons.=
=20
Installing a new system or running a massive portinstall is no problem - ju=
st=20
set BATCH and you'll be fine. And if you already know what OPTIONS you want=
,=20
additionally set them in make.conf as usual and you'll be fine, too.

=2D-=20
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi@freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org

--Boundary-02=_+2pCBvW5CJMjBkX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBBCp2+Xhc68WspdLARAoluAJ9Ij7g1meieLwUQbMFH+MjPFxvCAgCfT4iT
dsCVxP7jd7brEDMb4Ix9PT0=
=TE5s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_+2pCBvW5CJMjBkX--