Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 22:16:15 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: trustedbsd-audit@TrustedBSD.org, K?vesd?n G?bor <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu>, current@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Audit integration into CVS in progress, some tree disruption Message-ID: <43E1797F.4010902@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <20060202011453.Y87763@fledge.watson.org> References: <20060201221213.L87763@fledge.watson.org> <43E134AB.8000600@t-hosting.hu> <20060201222704.G87763@fledge.watson.org> <43E14C53.3060400@rogers.com> <20060202004044.GA99245@xor.obsecurity.org> <43E1586E.6090203@rogers.com> <20060202011453.Y87763@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson wrote: > And as such in the release notes. However, maybe we could add the > following also: > > - Dependence on defining "options EXPERIMENTAL" in the kernel > configuration > file -- if the kernel isn't compiled with the EXPERIMENTAL option, a > compile > error warning that it needs to be defined will be generated. > > - When a kernel is configured with an experimental feature, config > generates a > warning, similar to the ones it currently generates about GPL'd > components, > etc. I think thats a great idea. This is something that would be easily identified by a user. The bottom of a man page or relnotes may not always be viewed. This should apply to all code/features that are experimental.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43E1797F.4010902>