From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Wed Apr 13 13:12:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A67BB0F37D for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:12:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B364172A for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:12:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3DDCu6i045822 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:12:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208742] /boot/gptzfsboot boots kernel from another zpool (not root pool) Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:12:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: avg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:12:56 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208742 --- Comment #9 from Andriy Gapon --- (In reply to Steven Hartland from comment #3) We have some control via /boot.config or /boot/config, but they have to be placed on the first pool. BTW, I am not sure if just removing zfsloader fr= om the first pool is going to help. I suspect that that can result in a boot failure, but I am not sure. There has also been a proposal for the ZFS boot chain to ignore pools that = do not have bootfs explicitly set unless such a pool is an only discovered poo= l. I think that that makes sense. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=