From owner-freebsd-fs Wed Nov 29 18:43:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from linux.ssc.nsu.ru (linux.ssc.nsu.ru [193.124.219.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA73F37B402 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 18:43:10 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 117 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2000 02:43:05 -0000 Received: from inet.ssc.nsu.ru (62.76.110.12) by hub.freebsd.org with SMTP; 30 Nov 2000 02:43:05 -0000 Received: from localhost (danfe@localhost) by inet.ssc.nsu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA01703; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 08:42:56 +0600 Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 08:42:56 +0600 (NOVT) From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: fs@freebsd.org Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Block vs. frag sizes in newfs Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello! Sorry for x-posting: I've heard somewhere that not too many ppl actually read fs... AFAIR, there was a conversation going on concerning ${SUBJ}. I remember some thougths that -b = -f is sort of optimum, things like that... Or, why 8192/1024 are installation defaults?.. What it the truth behind all this? I'm intereted in any opinion. Thanks. -- DAN Fe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message