Date: 21 Feb 2002 22:36:39 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> Cc: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch to improve mutex collision performance Message-ID: <xzpheoa7c0o.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20020221221005.A78243@energyhq.homeip.net> References: <200202181912.g1IJCGK32122@apollo.backplane.com> <20020218114326.A98974@dragon.nuxi.com> <200202181951.g1IJpip33604@apollo.backplane.com> <20020218153807.E96115@locore.ca> <20020221111915.N65817@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20020221014909.A13952@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020221221005.A78243@energyhq.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> writes: > Well, if all developers started using p4, things would be easier and work > better in the long term. p4 is lightyears ahead of cvs, and, from what > I've read in this thread, developers are not exactly happy with cvs now, > as it's limitations have become evident. Perforce also has limitations. It does a number of things better than CVS, and a number of things worse. Its main problem, IMHO, is that it tries to do too much, at the expense of basic functionality. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpheoa7c0o.fsf>