From owner-cvs-all Thu Jun 15 13:22:31 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4927037B872; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 13:22:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA13933; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 16:22:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 16:22:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200006152022.QAA13933@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Cc: Alfred Perlstein , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern uipc_socket.c uipc_socket2.c src/sys/sys socket.h In-Reply-To: <200006151914.NAA25610@nomad.yogotech.com> References: <200006151818.LAA31278@freefall.freebsd.org> <200006151845.MAA25472@nomad.yogotech.com> <20000615120807.M18462@fw.wintelcom.net> <200006151914.NAA25610@nomad.yogotech.com> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > Waiting until data is sent (or received) is a bad thing, IMO, and > probably violates the TCP specifications. The entirely sockets programming model ``violates'' the TCP specifications. (I put that in quotation marks because I don't think anyone has seriously implemented the API suggested by the TCP designers.) This argument doesn't hold water. (I, personally, think it's the wrong way to go, but I understand the motivation for doing it.) -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message