Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 13:51:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> To: Jan-Simon Pendry <jsp@pendry.com> Cc: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us>, Francois-Rene Rideau <fare@tunes.org>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, NetBSD Kernel <tech-kern@netbsd.org> Subject: Re: Improving the Unix API Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906271350290.24019-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu> In-Reply-To: <377661C6.89FB7F5@pendry.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 27 Jun 1999, Jan-Simon Pendry wrote:
> Alexander Viro wrote:
> > Proposed API on the Linux side being
> > int chflags(name, level, oldp, newp); where level is FL_VFS for generic
> > attirbutes (fs may map them on its own set) and FL_{UFS,EXT2,...} for raw
> > flags - corresponding filesystem is free to interpret the thing as it
> > likes and should set the generic attributes in the right way.
>
> if linux introduces a different API (ie not just an extension of
> the existing bsd API) then please do *not* call it "chflags".
;-/ Yes, it makes sense.
> it took years just to get over the bsd vs. svr4 gettimeofday()
> fiasco. btw, what's the proposed API for getting the current
> attribute set?
oldp == NULL ;-)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.9906271350290.24019-100000>